If you choose to customise the site it will help you to find the most relevant content for your needs. You will still be able to access all content on the site.
Don't have an account? Click here to register
A patient with with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who had smoked for many years saw a new GP about a persistent cough. The GP made a brief note of the consultation: ‘cough, no signs, likely exacerbation of COPD, for antibiotics and steroids, see as needed.’
Six months later, the patient returned after losing a significant amount of weight and the GP sent her for urgent tests, which led to a diagnosis of lung cancer.
The patient’s family complained to the GMC, whose expert report criticised the medical records and the GP’s failure to have provided any safety netting advice in a patient with risk factors for lung cancer.
The GP recognised that her record-keeping was inadequate at the first appointment and accepted she should have documented the examination and a thorough history. She also agreed that she should have specifically advised the patient to return for a re-assessment if the symptoms were not settling.
Noting that she had shown insight, the GMC case examiners agreed undertakings with the GP, including a commitment to complete further training and work under supervision pending a further review of her practice. These undertakings would stay on her record for 10 years.
This page was correct at publication on . Any guidance is intended as general guidance for members only. If you are a member and need specific advice relating to your own circumstances, please contact one of our advisers.
Be the first to comment