If you choose to customise the site it will help you to find the most relevant content for your needs. You will still be able to access all content on the site.
Log in is temporarily unavailable whilst we carry out essential maintenance. Service will be restored as soon as possible. We are sorry for any inconvenience caused.
A patient went to see her GP because she had been feeling anxious and depressed following the breakdown of her marriage. The GP was new to the practice, so he looked back through the clinical record and noticed the patient had attempted suicide five years ago after an argument with her husband.
However, when he asked the patient about this, she became angry and denied that she had ever tried to kill herself. She demanded that the GP remove this entry from the record because she had a legal right to correct inaccurate information and it would cause doctors to judge her unfairly.
The GP sought advice from the practice’s data protection officer. She explained that as a data subject, the patient had the right to correct data if it is factually inaccurate or incomplete, such as a misspelt name, but this does not extend to clinical opinions.
At her suggestion, the GP went back to the patient to explain the situation and suggest an alternative course of making an additional note that she disagreed with the content. He also reassured her that he had made no judgment about her based on the record. He was only interested in whether she would benefit from mental health support.
The patient was disappointed but accepted his suggestion. She also agreed to the GP’s proposal to refer her to a counsellor.
This page was correct at publication on . Any guidance is intended as general guidance for members only. If you are a member and need specific advice relating to your own circumstances, please contact one of our advisers.
Be the first to comment